Ethical Issues in the Victorian Desalination Plant

When advancing businesses or projects, it is important not to forget the consequences of the proposed project. This is because there are impacts, either on the environment or on individual lives or a community, that are caused by every endeavour. Construction of the Wonthaggi Desalination Plant (WDP) is an issue that raises various ethical issues as regards its sustainability, its effects on the nearby environment and its cost benefits. This paper addresses the moral issues and stance regarding the construction of the WDP.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Ethical Issues in the Victorian Desalination Plant specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More By employing the utilitarian and Kantian reasoning, it is concluded that the WDP is not a right action as it does not enhance greater good for the majority; the construction of the plant ignores the possible negative effects on the surrounding environment, not to mention that it is not a sustainable approach to water supply. The Wonthaggi Desalination Plant has been questioned as a project that leads to considerable climate change in addition to its potential negative effects on marine environment. Given that the plant is very close to the coastline, it has been suggested that the plant could lead to a surge in storms making the area susceptible to effects of rise in sea level (Fisher, 2010). In such a case, the huge annual pay amounting to about $570 million is blinding everyone, thus neglecting the likely consequence of flooding that would come if the project is advanced (Fisher, 2010). This is an advancement of Kant’s reasoning in that the construction of the desalination plant does not give consideration to the consequences of the action. However, it is imperative that maximum good to a majority, as enhanced by utilitarianism, be achieved by setting up this project (Audi, 2011). By constructing the WDP, it is expected that while there will be an increase in water supply to Melbourne’s residents, the marine ecosystem will be affected adversely. Since the location of the plant is very close to the coastline, it is expected that ecotoxic effluents will be discharged into the ocean thus threatening the existence of marine life (Watershed Victoria, 2009). The project has also been foreseen as unsustainable, more so with a rising population. It is therefore argued that more sustainable as well as affordable options should have been considered. Such options would include capturing rain water or water from storms or managing waste water effectively. In fact storm water, if well managed, could result into better water security since the water would be channelled to Melbourne’s storages as well as give room for restoration of damaged ecosystems since urban waterways would be guarded from a lot of damage (Watershed Victoria, 2009).Advertising Looking for assessment on business economics? Let's see if we can hel p you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More From the above discussion on possible negative consequences of advancing the WDP, it is arguable that this project is not morally right as it does not enhance maximum good to a majority the long run. The creation of jobs by the project blinds the fact that serious environmental effects would result, given the proximity of the WDP to the coastline. Kant’s reasoning thus seems to be enhanced since the consequences are not greatly considered in this case. Alternative water sources such as managing storm and rain water effectively is a more sustainable and cost effective approach that has been suggested. The argument is that the WDP has less financial benefits since it is a remote and centralised water supply that is not environmentally sustainable. However, the alternative water supplies are a form of â€Å"integrated water cycle management† (Watershed Victoria 2009, para 7) that would promote financial benefits and environmental sustainability. These alternatives would promote utilitarianism. Reference List Audi, R. 2011, Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge, 3rd edition. New York, NY: Routledge. Fisher, P. 2010, October 8, Building for a cantankerous planet. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/building-for-a-cantankerous-planet-20101008-16bc2.html Watershed Victoria. 2009, Why would you build a huge industrial plant here? Expert opinion. Web. This assessment on Ethical Issues in the Victorian Desalination Plant was written and submitted by user Abigail Dixon to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Constance Weavers 12 Principles for Teaching Grammar

Constance Weaver's 12 Principles for Teaching Grammar For many years, when middle and high school English teachers would ask me to recommend a good book for teaching grammar, Id direct them to Constance Weavers Teaching Grammar in Context (Heinemann, 1996). Based on sound research and extensive road testing, Weavers book views grammar as a positive activity for making meaning, not just an exercise in tracking down ​errors or labeling parts of speech. But Ive stopped recommending Teaching Grammar in Context, though its still in print. Now I encourage teachers to pick up a copy of Weavers more recent book, Grammar to Enrich and Enhance Writing (Heinemann, 2008). Assisted by her colleague Jonathan Bush, Dr. Weaver does more than simply rework the concepts introduced in her earlier study. She delivers on her promise to offer a text thats more comprehensive, more reader-friendly, and more concretely focused on teachers practical needs. The fastest way to help you decide whether youd get along with Dr. Weaver, theoretically speaking, is to reprint her 12 principles for teaching grammar to enrich and enhance writingprinciples that underlie all the varied activities in her book. Teaching grammar divorced from writing doesnt strengthen writing and therefore wastes time.Few grammatical terms are actually needed to discuss writing.Sophisticated grammar is fostered in literacy-rich and language-rich environments.Grammar instruction for writing should build upon students developmental readiness.Grammar options are best expanded through reading and in conjunction with writing.Grammar conventions taught in isolation seldom transfer to writing.Marking corrections on students papers does little good.Grammar conventions are applied most readily when taught in conjunction with editing.Instruction in conventional editing is important for all students but must honor their home language or dialect.Progress may involve new kinds of errors as students try to apply new writing skills.Grammar instruction should be included during various phases of writing.More research is needed on effective ways of teaching grammar to strengthen writing. To learn more about Constance Weavers Grammar to Enrich and Enhance Writing (and to read a sample chapter), visit the Heinemann website.